|
freemuslims.org Speaks Out
By Andrew L. Jaffee, September 14, 2004 |
Home Search Forum Terms |
|
People from all walks of life keep asking me the same question: “Are there moderate Muslims?” I know myself that there are, but… Many of the moderates are faced with intimidation by militant Muslims (“Islamists”). Muslims also have to contend with old cultural habits, hateful religious leaders, a bigoted press, and schools that teach hatred and homicide bombings. As usual, just as things seem the darkest, I happen upon something that brightens my spirit -- at least a little. Last week, FOXNews mentioned the organization “Free Muslim Coalition Against Terrorism” (FMCAT). I immediately went to their website, and was surprised at what I found. When posed with the “Are there moderate Muslims?” question, I often react as eminent Middle East expert Daniel Pipes taught me: …I dutifully provide lists of names and organizations, then confess that they [moderate Muslims] are largely fractured, isolated, intimidated, and ineffectual. The press has done a disservice to moderate Muslims by editing news about terrorism and pumping up Islamists as "mainstream." Take the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which the BBC calls a “leading Islamic advocacy group.” CAIR’s current and former members have a horrifying track record. The group’s former Communications Specialist and Civil Rights Coordinator, Randall Todd "Ismail" Royer, was sentenced in April to 20 years in prison for “participation in a network of militant jihadists centered in Northern Virginia,” according to the Department of Justice. Earlier Royer pled guilty to involvement with the Kashmiri terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, ties to Afghanistan's Taliban, connections to Chechnya's terrorists, and last but not least, involvement with Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network. Specific indictments against Royer included explosives and weapons charges. He also admitted to helping several people "gain entry to a terrorist training camp in Pakistan." Siraj Wahhaj, one of CAIR's advisory board members, is an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing case. Nihad Awad, CAIR’s Executive Director, has declared himself a supporter of Hamas and the PLO, which are both on the official U.S. list of terrorist organizations. And Bassem Khafagi, CAIR's director of community relations, "was arrested by the FBI in January in connection with a terror-financing front group he helped found that is allegedly tied to both Iraq and al Qaeda." Note that Khafagi has pled guilty to "charges of visa and bank fraud in federal court in Detroit." CAIR is "mainstream?" Maybe that explains why my Diogenes's lamp has found moderate Muslims to be rare. But I'm hopeful when Muslims do raise a voice of reason. I don’t want to celebrate too soon -- boy, have I been burned in the past -- but let’s start out taking FMCAT at face value. What struck me most about the Free Muslim Coalition’s website was their headline story, “We are so Sorry for 9-11.” This isn’t an admission of collective guilt, nor is it a whitewash of Muslim involvement in 9/11. On the other hand, I can't tell if it is a well-written rebuttal of the Muslim victim mentality and blame-game that is all too prevalent nowadays, or a statement that sounds too good to be true: After September 11, many in the Muslim world chose denial and hallucination rather than face up to the sad fact that Muslims perpetrated the 9-11 terrorist acts and that we have an enormous problem with extremism and support for terrorism. Many Muslims, including religious leaders, and “intellectuals” blamed 9-11 on a Jewish conspiracy and went as far as fabricating a tale that 4000 Jews did not show up for work in the World Trade Center on 9-11. Yet others blamed 9-11 on an American right wing conspiracy or the U.S. Government which allegedly wanted an excuse to invade Iraq and “steal” Iraqi oil.
The author, Kamal Nawash, president of FMCAT, advocates some concrete steps Muslims can take before “it is too late:” Muslims must look inward and put a stop to many of our religious leaders who spend most of their sermons teaching hatred, intolerance and violent jihad. We should not be afraid to admit that as Muslims we have a problem with violent extremism. We should not be afraid to admit that so many of our religious leaders belong behind bars and not behind a pulpit. Only moderate Muslims can challenge and defeat extremist Muslims. We can no longer afford to be silent. If we remain silent to the extremism within our community then we should not expect anyone to listen to us when we complain of stereotyping and discrimination by non-Muslims; we should not be surprised when the world treats all of us as terrorists; we should not be surprised when we are profiled at airports. Simply put, not only do Muslims need to join the war against terror, we need to take the lead in this war. The Free Muslim Coalition is headquartered in -- where else – the good old USA (Washington, DC). The group will be physically safer in the U.S. It will enjoy protection from anti-free-speech zealots like those in the Canadian government. Unfortunately, Nawash’s words will be considered blasphemy even by many American Muslims as Islamists have “taken over 80 percent of the mosques” in the United States. Nonetheless, FMCAT is here and takes many “controversial” (i.e., sensible) positions. FMCAT rejects the Islamist party line requiring strict adherence to the Koran and universal/forced conversion of the world’s populace to Islam: The Free Muslim Coalition Against Terrorism does not seek to change the tenets of the religion. However, the Coalition believes that the Koran only provides general principals of governance which leaves the faithful with substantial flexibility to modernize popular Muslim practices and beliefs. FMCAT “believes that there can NEVER be a justification for terrorism,” instead of hocking the usual “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter” mantra. The Free Muslim Coalition believes that democracy and economic development will be the cure for terrorism: …that if more people in the Middle East were given an opportunity to play a role in their governance then they will be less likely to resort to terrorism as a means to effect political change. ... The Free Muslim Coalition rejects Islamist anti-Jewish rhetoric (“Don't Blame the ‘Jews’”) and implicitly supports Israel's right to exist. Because of FMCAT's positive view of democracy and capitalism, I would venture to believe that they've noticed how the Israelis, with a tiny population of 6.5 million, have built a $122 billion economy [1] -- only 2.46% of which is U.S. aid. But FMCAT goes soft on the problem of Palestinian terrorism. They do state that Muslim terrorist groups have cynically used the Palestinian/Israeli conflict to justify terrorism. While they don’t explicitly equate Israel’s democracy with the terrorist chaos that rules Palestinians, FMCAT’s proposed solutions to the conflict are half-hearted at best. For example, the Free Muslim Coalition states, We understand why President Bush does not want to work with Yasser Arafat. However, President Bush’s refusal to work with Arafat does not mean we should do nothing. The United States can work with the Palestinian Prime Minister instead. If Arafat fires the Prime Minister, the United States should work with the prime minister that replaces him. … While rejecting Arafat is a good thing, advocating negotiations with his front-men is useless. We all know what happened to the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) first prime minister, Mahmoud Abbas. He was fired because he tried to limit some of Arafat’s absolute power. Arafat and his PA are in too deep with the terrorists. FMCAT’s conclusion about the Palestinian/Israeli conflict is just feel-good fluff. If they’d done their homework, FMCAT would remember that Israel tried to negotiate with the Arabs in 1918, 1949, 1967, 1968, 1974, 1975, 1978, 1979, 1993, and 2000, and gave up territory for peace in 1957, 1974, 1975, 1982, 1988, 1994, 1995, and 1998. If FMCAT really is a “Coalition Against Terrorism,” it should explicitly call for the destruction of all Palestinian terrorist groups and the removal of Arafat as PA president. Will FMCAT have staying power? The group already has reported that its members have been threatened for straying from the Islamist party line. Is FMCAT for real? I hope so. I haven’t had enough time to follow the group, but I will and shall regularly report on their activities. FMCAT has 9 local chapters in the U.S., and one office in New Zealand. Their website collects reports on “Muslim extremism or support for terrorism.” They also have a newsletter (see their homepage). |